Annals of Thoracic Medicine Official publication of the Saudi Thoracic Society, affiliated to King Saud University
Search Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe e-Alerts Login 
Home Email this article link Print this article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size

Year : 2007  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 61-63
The incidence of complications of central venous catheters at an intensive care unit

Consultant Intensivist, Department of Intensive Care Unit, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, Bahrain

Date of Submission01-Mar-2007
Date of Acceptance26-Mar-2007

Correspondence Address:
A H Akmal
Consultant Intensivist ICU, Salmaniya Medical Complex, P. O. Box. 12, Manama
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.32232

Rights and Permissions


Central venous catheter (CVC) placement in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a common practice and is being increasingly used also in general wards. Its use is associated with both mechanical and infectious complications. Objective : To determine the infectious and mechanical complication rate of central venous catheterization in an ICU. Design : A retrospective study about complications of 1319 central venous catheter placements. Setting : An 11-bed adult medical, surgical, neuro-trauma ICU at salmaniya medical complex, Bahrain . Materials and Methods : This was a retrospective review of all central venous catheter inserted over 4 year's period from October 2002 to December 2006. Results : There were 12 mechanical complications and 128 infectious complications total of 1319 CVCs placed. Conclusions : The CVC can be performed safely in an ICU if done by a competent physician with all aseptic precautions

Keywords: Central venous catheter, complications, infections, intensive care unit

How to cite this article:
Akmal A H, Hasan M, Mariam A. The incidence of complications of central venous catheters at an intensive care unit. Ann Thorac Med 2007;2:61-3

How to cite this URL:
Akmal A H, Hasan M, Mariam A. The incidence of complications of central venous catheters at an intensive care unit. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2007 [cited 2023 Jan 31];2:61-3. Available from:

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used in critically ill patients throughout the world. They permit hemodynamic monitoring and allow reliable access for the administration of fluids, blood products, medications and total parenteral nutrition (TPN). [1]

The use of CVC is routine in critically ill patients, in fact, in the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) study, 78% of the patients had some form of CVC inserted [2] Central venous catheterization may cause different complications including infection, hemorrhage and thrombosis. Mortality in catheter-related infection is the main reason for the widespread interest in CVC. [3] The question as to which venous catheterization site is associated with the highest risk of infection, remains controversial. Most catheter-associated infections are caused by Gram-positive (GP) organisms, in particular coagulase-negative staphylococci, though Gram-negative (GN) organisms still account for up to 28% of these infections. [4] Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBIs) are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Development of CRBIs may occur by several mechanisms. Our objective is to study the infectious and mechanical complication rates of percutaneously placed femoral and nonfemoral central venous catheters in critically ill adult patients.

   Materials and Methods Top

We studied the infectious and mechanical complication rates of percutaneously placed femoral and non-femoral central venous catheters in critically ill adult patients in a retrospective manner in an adult medical, surgical, neuro-surgical ICU. This study was conducted over a 4 year period from October 2002 to December 2006, The monthly admission to this ICU ranging from 45-50 cases. The average acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) was 22 with a mortality of 17%. we used all multi-lumen catheters for central venous lines.

Sterilization: When inserting a catheter, we used maximal sterile-barrier precautions including a mask, a cap, a sterile gown, sterile gloves and a large sterile drape. Povidone-iodine based solutions were used to prepare the skin before insertion of the catheter.

Culture for suspected CRI: Once catheter-related infections were suspected, all catheter sites were examined carefully. If there was any purulence or erythemas, an exit-site infection was considered likely and the catheter removed. Two samples of blood were drawn from peripheral sites for culture to evaluate the possibility of bacteremia. This was done because it is difficult to determine whether a positive culture of blood from a CVC indicates contamination of the hub, catheter colonization or a catheter-related bloodstream infection. Due to this difficulty in establishing the possibility of bacteremia from a CVC, besides the peripheral blood sampling, all suspected CRI catheters were removed and the tips sent for culture along with the blood.

   Result Top

A total number of 1319 CVCs were inserted using Seldinger technique. 579 CVCs (43.8%) were inserted through the femoral vein (FV), 464 CVCs (35.1%) inserted through the internal jugular vein (IJV) and 276 (20.9%) through the subclavian vein (SV). Out of these 1319 catherizations, 128 (9.7%) became infectious complications. We found that the FV was more susceptible to infection with an incidence of 88/128 (15%) whereas IJV infection was seen in 20/464 (4.3%) patients. FV infection was caused mainly by Staphylococci epidermidis (staph-epi; 34%), Staphylococcus aureus (staph. aur.; 26%). Forty-two percent of the 1319 CVCs placed during this interval were femoral. Noninfectious complications were recognized in 1.5% of femoral catheters and 0.5% of nonfemoral catheters. Mechanical complications were manifested as hematomas of which 2/464 (0.43%) formed in the neck in IJV catheters. However, these hematomas subsided without any intervention or blood transfusion. Two patients out of 200 (0.72%) developed pneumothorax during subclavian vein catheter insertion. Both patients required chest tubes which were removed after five days. Nine out of 579 patients (1.5%) who had had CVCs inserted through the FV developed hematomas out of which one patient developed ilio-femoral deep vein thrombosis and infection at the site of insertion and expired. All procedures were performed by a well experienced intensivist or by an experienced senior resident.

A comparison among three central venous line sites based on culture results showed that the infection rate was 9.7% ( n= 128/1319). For the IJV site, 234 catheter tips has been sent for culture. Twenty of these catheter tips were found to be colonized by bacteria thus bringing the infection rate at the IJV site to 4.3%. Central lines inserted in the subclavian site showed a 10% infection rate as 28 catheters tips out of 276 was infected. The femoral site showed the highest infection rate (15.1%) as 88 out of 579 catheters were found infected. There was occurrence of total 12 mechanical complications out of the 1319 CVCs inserted (0.98%).

   Discussion Top

CVCs are an important tool in the operation room and ICU. The use of CVCs is associated with both mechanical and infectious complications. [5]

Out of 1319 CVCs inserted, 619 tips of the catheters were sent for culture and sensitivity. One hundred and twenty eight of these catheter tips were positive fr bacterial cultures for different organisms. Hence, all infected CVCs were removed and the patients were treated with appropriate antibiotics.

CVC-related systemic infections were found in 15% of patients with femoral catheters, 10% with subclavian catheters and 4.3% with internal jugular catheters. Catheters inserted during emergency situations were exchanged within first 24 hours. All procedures being performed by a qualified intensivist or a competent senior resident under strict aseptic precautions. Cultures were performed on the tips of the catheters using endothelial brushing and maki roll techniques.

Catheter-related sepsis is a well known complication in critically ill patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. [6] Micro-organisms may travel from the skin puncture wound along the external surface of the catheter or from the hub through the lumen of the catheter, to be shed into the circulation causing bacteraemia and sepsis. The incidence of sepsis is said to be about three times greater with multiple-lumen catheters than with single-lumen catheters. [6]

Skin organisms colonizing the distal intravascular tip of the catheter ultimately cause bloodstream infection. [7] Hub contamination is more common in long-term catheters because such catheters often have to be intercepted and manipulated. [7]

Organisms are usually introduced into the hub from the hands of medical personnel. From this contaminated hub, the organisms migrate along the internal surface of the catheter, where they can cause a bloodstream infection. [8] Fever and signs of sepsis, such as chills, rigors, hypotension and hyperventilation should always be considered as CRI when there is no other identifiable source of infection is present. But clinical findings are unreliable for establishing a diagnosis of CRI. [8]

Catheter-associated infections can be considered local or systemic. Local phenomena include simple colonization or true infection that may involve the exit site or tunnel. Local inflammatory signs at the catheter's portal of entry or tunnel have a highly predictive value for infection but its absence has a very poor negative value. [9]

The skin insertion site and the catheter hub are by far the two most important sources; approximately 65% of CRI originate from the skin flora, 30% from the contaminated hub and 5% from other pathways. [10]

Quantitative blood culturing techniques have been developed as alternatives for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients for whom catheter removal is undesirable because of limited vascular access. [11] The practice of routinely changing catheters in a predefined time period to reduce the risk of CRI is referred to as "scheduled" replacement. There is no support from the literature that catheter replacement at scheduled time intervals will reduce the CRI rates. [12] The risk of complication during the insertion or exchange of CVCs has been well documented. The majority of complications involve mechanical problems associated with insertion. Although cardiac arrhythmia has been acknowledged as a possible complication, its incidence has never been quantified. [13]

In critically ill patients, barotrauma and puncture of an incompressible artery are probably the most common mechanical complications and can be life-threatening. The rate of mechanical complications has ranged from 0-12%, according to the experience of the operator and the definition of complications; [14] Mechanical complications include arterial puncture, pneumothorax, mediastinal haematoma, haemothorax and injury to adjacent nerves. The recent introduction of more flexible catheters and of the J guide-wire insertion method has decreased the rate of severe mechanical complications. Although fatal complications still occur, [15] in our study, the mechanical complication rate was 0.9%.

In the meta-analysis by Ruesch and coworkers, [16] arterial punctures were significantly more common with the jugular than with the subclavian approach (six trials, 2010 CVCs; 3% vs 0.5%; relative risk (RR) 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI)

2.05-10.77). However, bleeding from a punctured internal carotid artery can usually be controlled by manual compression. A hematoma may occur, though, particularly when a dilator or pulmonary artery catheter is inserted in a patient with haemostasis disorders. A large hematoma may produce rare but serious complications including airway obstruction, retrograde aortic dissection, arteriovenous fistula or cerebrovascular events in patients with occlusive atheromatous disease of the carotid artery. [16]

Most studies have demonstrated that the use of prophylactic antibiotics is associated with reduction in the rate of catheter-related bloodstream infections. [17] However, this use of antibiotics is discouraged because of the concern that it will encourage the emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms. [18] As with most medical procedures, the level of experience of the physician reduces the risk of complications. [19] Insertion of a catheter by a physician who has performed 50 or more catheterizations is half as likely to result in a mechanical complication as an insertion by a physician who has performed fewer than 50 catheterizations. [19] The incidence of mechanical complications after three or more insertion attempts is six times the rate after one attempt. [20] Hence, if a physician is unable to insert a catheter after three attempts, he or she should seek help rather than continue to attempt the procedure.

   Conclusion Top

The choice of the best central venous access for a particular patient is based on the rate and the severity of failures and complications. Based on our experience, internal jugular access is associated with a low rate of severe mechanical and infectious complications in the intensive care unit as compared with subclavian and femoral access. We conclude as per our experience that CVCs play an important role in treating critically ill patients in an adult ICU but may cause serious multiple mechanical and infectious complications if proper precautions are not taken.

   References Top

1.Raad II, Bodey GP. Infectious complications of indwelling vascular catheters. Clin Infect Dis 1992;15:197-208.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  
2.Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, et al . The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA 1995;274:639-44.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Spengler RF, Greenough WB. Hospital costs and mortality attributed to nosocomial bacteremias. JAMA 1978;240:2455-8.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128-40.   Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
5.Girbes AR, Polderman KH. Mechanical and infectious complications of central venous catheters. Minerva Anestesiol 2003;69:330-2.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Gupta S, Batra YK, Puri GD, Panigrahi D, Roy S. Infection rates in single- and double-lumen central venous catheters in critically ill patients. Natl Med J India 1995;8:114-7.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Linares J, Sitges-Serra A, Garau J, Perez JL, Martin R. Pathogenesis of catheter sepsis: A prospective study with quantitative and semiquantitative cultures of catheter hub and segments. J Clin Microbiol 1985;21:357-60.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
8.Raad II, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ, Suleiman N, Hill LA, Bruso PA, et al . Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:231-8.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9.Collignon PJ. Intravascular catheter associated sepsis: A common problem. The Australian Study on Intravascular Catheter Associated Sepsis. Med J Aust 1994;161:374-8.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Bouza E, Burillo A, Munoz P. Catheter-related infections: Diagnosis and intravascular treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8:265-74.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
11.Fan ST, Teoh-Chan CH, Lau KF. Evaluation of central venous catheter sepsis by differential quantitative blood culture. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1989;8:142-4.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  
12.Cook D, Randolph A, Kernerman P, Cupido C, King D, Soukup C, et al . Central venous catheter replacement strategies: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 1997;25:1417-24.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
13.Stuart RK, Shikora SA, Akerman P, Lowell JA, Baxter JK, Apovian C, et al . Incidence of arrhythmia with central venous catheter insertion and exchange. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1990;14:152-5.   Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  
14. Lefrant JY, Muller L, De La Coussaye JE, Prudhomme M, Ripart J, Gouzes C, et al . Risk factors of failure and immediate complication of subclavian vein catheterization in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2002, 28:1036-41.  Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
15.Polderman KH, Girbes AJ. Central venous catheter use. Part 1: Mechanical complications. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1-17.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Asteri T, Tsagaropoulou I, Vasiliadis K, Fessatidis I, Papavasi-Liou E, Spyrou P. Beware Swan-Ganz complications. Perioperative management. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2002;43:467-70.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Henrickson KJ, Axtell RA, Hoover SM, Kuhn SM, Pritchett J, Kehl SC, et al . Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections and thrombotic events in immunocompromized children by the use of vancomycin/ciprofloxacin/heparin flush solution: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1269-78.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
18.Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance. Recommendations of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recomm Rep 1995;44:1-13.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Sznajder JI, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H, Weiner P, Bursztein S. Central vein catheterization: Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches. Arch Intern Med 1986;146:259-61.  Back to cited text no. 19  [PUBMED]  
20.Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, Gregurich MA, Ota DM. Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1735-8.  Back to cited text no. 20  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]

This article has been cited by
1 Creation of a medical procedure service in a tertiary medical center: Blueprint and procedural outcomes
Kevin G. Buell, Muhammad H. Hayat, David W. Walsh, Kathleene T. Wooldridge, Eduard E. Vasilevskis, Lawrence T. Heller
Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Nurses and Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Versus Traditional Venous Access: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
Quincy K. Tran, Kevin Flanagan, Matthew Fairchild, Isha Yardi, Ali Pourmand
Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Influence of recumbency on the pulmonary shunt in sevoflurane-anaesthetised sheep
Roberto Romano do Prado Filho, Mariana Cardoso Sanches, Adriano Bonfim Carregaro
Ciência Rural. 2022; 52(11)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Comparison of Complications in Patients with Central Venous Catheter Placement Via Internal Jugular, Subclavian and Femoral Route at Intensive Care Unit
Mohammad Haroon, Ayesha Anwer
Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences. 2022; : 30
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Qualitative study on the factors that increase difficulty in peripheral venipuncture based on nurses’ experiences
Japanese Journal of Health and Human Ecology. 2021; 87(2): 57
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy by Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasonography-Guided Hydration in Chronic Heart Failure Patients
Yuanming Yan, Mingfang Ye, Xianfeng Dong, Qin Chen, Huashan Hong, Lianglong Chen, Yukun Luo
Cardiology. 2021; 146(2): 187
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Ultrasound guidance for urgent arterial and venous catheterisation: randomised controlled study
Stephen Lazaar, Amélie Mazaud, Claire Delsuc, Maeva Durand, Benjamin Delwarde, Sophie Debord, Baptiste Hengy, Guillaume Marcotte, Bernard Floccard, Frédéric Dailler, Pierre Chirossel, Pascale Bureau-Du-Colombier, Julien Berthiller, Thomas Rimmelé
British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2021; 127(6): 871
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Causes of an elevated international normalized ratio in the intensive care unit and the implications for plasma transfusion
Jared W. Cheves, Sandra DeMarinis, Claudia Sorin, Gerardo Carino, Joseph D. Sweeney
Transfusion. 2021; 61(10): 2862
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Creation and Testing of a Deep Learning Algorithm to Automatically Identify and Label Vessels, Nerves, Tendons, and Bones on Cross-sectional Point-of-Care Ultrasound Scans for Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement by Novices
Michael Blaivas, Robert Arntfield, Matthew White
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2020; 39(9): 1721
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Successful Salvage of Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Catheter-Related or Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections by Using a Catheter Lock Solution Consisting of Minocycline, EDTA, and 25% Ethanol
Issam Raad, Anne-Marie Chaftari, Ramia Zakhour, Mary Jordan, Zanaib Al Hamal, Ying Jiang, Ammar Yousif, Kumait Garoge, Victor Mulanovich, George M. Viola, Soha Kanj, Egbert Pravinkumar, Joel Rosenblatt, Ray Hachem
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2016; 60(6): 3426
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Ventricular Tachycardia from a Central Line Fracture Fragment Embolus: A Rare Complication of a Commonly Used Procedure—A Case Report and Review of the Relevant Literature
Saptarshi Biswas,Patrick McNerney
Case Reports in Critical Care. 2015; 2015: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 ¿Mejora la seguridad con un nuevo método de inserción de PICC?
Jona Caparas,Jian Ping Hu,Hwei-San Hung
Nursing (Ed. española). 2015; 32(1): 61
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Emergency Central Venous Catheterization during Trauma Resuscitation: A Safety Analysis by Site
Rachel L. Choron, Andrew Wang, Kathryn Van Orden, Lisa Capano-Wehrle, Mark J. Seamon
The American Surgeon. 2015; 81(5): 527
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Ultrasound Evaluation of Saphenous Vein for Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation in Adults
Travis Jones, Nicholas Stea, Uwe Stolz, Srikar Adhikari
The Journal of Vascular Access. 2015; 16(5): 418
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Comparison of the Effects of Heparin and 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solutions in Maintenance of Patency of Central Venous Catheters
Mohammad Ali Heidari Gorji,Fatemeh Rezaei,Hedayat Jafari,Jamshid Yazdani Cherati
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2015; 5(2)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Can Stroke Volume Variation Be an Alternative to Central Venous Pressure in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation?
J.-H. Chin,I.-G. Jun,J. Lee,H. Seo,G.-S. Hwang,Y.-K. Kim
Transplantation Proceedings. 2014; 46(10): 3363
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Does a novel method of PICC insertion improve safety?
Jona Caparas,Jian Ping Hu,Hwei-San Hung
Nursing. 2014; 44(5): 65
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Intraosseous Access in Trauma by Air Medical Retrieval Teams
Mark Sheils,Mark Ross,Noel Eatough,Nicholas D. Caputo
Air Medical Journal. 2014; 33(4): 161
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access Program Is Associated With a Marked Reduction in Central Venous Catheter Use in Noncritically Ill Emergency Department Patients
Hamid Shokoohi,Keith Boniface,Melissa McCarthy,Tareq Khedir Al-tiae,Mehdi Sattarian,Ru Ding,Yiju Teresa Liu,Ali Pourmand,Elizabeth Schoenfeld,James Scott,Robert Shesser,Kabir Yadav
Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2013; 61(2): 198
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access program is associated with a marked reduction in central venous catheter use in noncritically ill emergency department patients
Shokoohi, H. and Boniface, K. and McCarthy, M. and Khedir Al-Tiae, T. and Sattarian, M. and Ding, R. and Liu, Y.T. and Pourmand, A. and Schoenfeld, E. and Scott, J. and Shesser, R. and Yadav, K.
Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2013; 61(2): 198-203
21 Hemiplegia caused by inadvertent subclavian artery double-lumen catheterization
Ghayas, A. and Ayesha and Khan, T.H. and Nabi, Z. and Shafique, S.
Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care. 2012; 16(2): 198-200
22 Guardiva: A novel antimicrobial haemostatic iv dressing: Part 1
Donnellan, P.D., Real, K., Ní Beilliú, M.
British Journal of Nursing. 2011; 20(sup 19): 22-28
23 GuardlVa: a novel antimicrobial haemostatic IV dressing: Part 1
Peter D Donnellan, Keith Real, Máire Ní Beilliú
British Journal of Nursing. 2011; 20(Sup11): S22
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Central venous catheter practice in an adult intensive care setting in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia
Memon, J.I., Rehmani, R.S., Venter, J.L., Alaithan, A., Ahsan, I., Khan, S.
Saudi Medical Journal. 2010; 31(7): 803-807
25 Prevention of nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit
Kanouff, A.J. and Dehaven, K.D. and Kaplan, P.D.
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly. 2008; 31(4): 302-308
26 Prevention of Nosocomial Infections in the Intensive Care Unit
Alan J. Kanouff,Kurt D. DeHaven,Peter D. Kaplan
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly. 2008; 31(4): 302
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Print this article  Email this article
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (114 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Materials and Me...

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded1232    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 26    

Recommend this journal