Annals of Thoracic Medicine Official publication of the Saudi Thoracic Society, affiliated to King Saud University
Search Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe e-Alerts Login 
Home Email this article link Print this article Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size

Year : 2010  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 250-251
Authors' reply

Department of Infection Prevention and Control, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh; Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), States and WHO Collaborating Center for Infection Prevention and Control, Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication7-Sep-2010

Correspondence Address:
Hanan H Balkhy
Department of Infection Prevention and Control, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh; Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), States and WHO Collaborating Center for Infection Prevention and Control
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

PMID: 20981192

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
El-Saed A, Al-Otaibi B, Balkhy HH. Authors' reply. Ann Thorac Med 2010;5:250-1

How to cite this URL:
El-Saed A, Al-Otaibi B, Balkhy HH. Authors' reply. Ann Thorac Med [serial online] 2010 [cited 2023 Feb 2];5:250-1. Available from:


We thank Dr. Wiwanitkit [1] for his interest in our recently published article about our experience in improving rates of influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare workers (HCWs) at our tertiary care facility in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. [2] In this article, training advocate nurses together with engaging nursing service in the efforts to enhance the vaccination coverage may have contributed to about 2.5 folds increase of vaccination coverage (from 29 to 77%). We believe we still have a room for further improvement especially after the slight drop happened last year concomitant with the recent H1N1 influenza pandemic (April 2009).

Dr. Wiwanitkit raised important questions about the best techniques to improve influenza vaccination coverage among HCWs. [1] We believe such improvement requires enhancement at all levels of any successful influenza vaccination program including education, training, engagement, motivation, accessibility, and mandate. [3],[4] Although we carried out huge efforts at all these levels, careful evaluation of 2009−2010 influenza vaccination campaign revealed more to be done to achieve our goal of more than 90% coverage. In addition to the overlapping educational and advertising materials used, we are planning to start 2010−2011 campaign by adding online learning module for all HCWs and online quiz for advocate nurses to improve influenza vaccination education and training. These new materials will challenge the myths that were linked to H1N1 vaccine and negatively impacted the last influenza vaccination campaign. We are planning to continue the fruitful partnership with nursing service that was shown to be successful in our facility and elsewhere. [2],[5] Free-vaccine accessibility will be further improved by adding weekend sessions at the employee health clinic.

Although we mandated influenza vaccination in 2009−2010 campaign in response to the recent H1N1 influenza pandemic, we did not get better rates of influenza vaccination coverage. We are planning a new modification in implementing the vaccination mandate in order to achieve the coverage goal. The signed waiver that was used inappropriately by some HCWs to report health-related reasons for decline needs to be replaced by an infection control "granted" waiver after reviewing a standard waiver application and supporting medical documentations. In case of waiver denial by the infection control staff, the HCW will have to get the vaccine or wear surgical mask while at work throughout the flu season, to maintain a fitness-for-duty requirement to continue working. Such approach was recently shown to be extremely successful in sustaining influenza vaccination coverage at 98% for many years. [6] In conclusion, no single technique is able to achieve high influenza vaccination coverage in HCWs, rather, a multipronged approach is required to achieve and sustain such a goal. Needless to say, without a strong support and commitment of the facility leadership, such approach would be difficult to implement.

   References Top

1.Wiwanitkit V. Influenza vaccination program for medical workers. Ann Thorac Med 2010;5:250.  Back to cited text no. 1    Medknow Journal  
2.Al-Otaibi BM, El-Saed A and Balkhy HH. Influenza vaccination among healthcare workers at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: Facing challenges. Ann Thorac Med 2010;5:120-1.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.Talbot TR, Dellit TH, Hebden J, Sama D, Cuny J. Factors associated with increased healthcare worker influenza vaccination rates: Results from a national survey of university hospitals and medical centers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:456-62.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Talbot TR. Improving rates of influenza vaccination among healthcare workers: Educate; motivate; mandate? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:107-10.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Nicholson MR, Hayes DM, Bennett AM. Partnering with nursing service improves health care worker influenza vaccination rates. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:484-9.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Rakita RM, Hagar BA, Crome P, Lammert JK. Mandatory Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Workers: A 5-Year Study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:881-8.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


Print this article  Email this article
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (241 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded413    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal